Skip to main content
Pending
Second half of 2020

Leverage ratio requirement for authorised deposit-taking institutions

This page contains information on APRA's consultations on the leverage ratio requirement for authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs).

November 2019

On 21 November 2019, APRA released for consultation a response to submissions in relation to the November 2018 consultation on the leverage ratio requirement for ADIs and also proposed further amendments to incorporate recent technical changes to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s leverage ratio standard. 

Written submissions on the proposal will be received until 7 February 2020.

The response letter and the clean and marked-up versions of the draft Prudential Standard APS 110 Capital Adequacy (APS 110) are available below:

Letter

Response to submissions - The leverage ratio - November 2019

Prudential standard

November 2018

The November consultation package sets out APRA's response to its initial consultation on the introduction of a leverage ratio requirement for ADIs. The package includes a response to submissions paper, a draft APS 110 and a draft Reporting Standard ARS 110.1 Leverage Ratio (ARS 110.1). 

The response paper, the clean and marked-up versions of draft APS 110, the draft ARS 110.1 and non-confidential submissions can be found below:

Response paper

Prudential standard

Reporting standard 

Submissions

February 2018

This discussion paper outlines APRA’s initial proposals for applying a minimum leverage ratio requirement for ADIs.

The discussion paper and non-confidential submission can be found below: 

Discussion paper

Submissions 

 

Note on submissions

It is APRA's policy to publish all submissions on the APRA website unless the respondent specifically tells APRA in writing that all or part of the submission is to remain confidential. An automatically generated confidentiality statement in an email does not satisfy this purpose. If you would like only part of your submission to be confidential, you should provide this information marked as 'confidential' in a separate attachment.