Australia Coat of Arms
APRA Logo
APRA Logo
copyright privacy disclaimer sitemap  
Advanced search    
 
         
 
     
  Home  
  About APRA  
  Careers  
  Policy  
  Research  
  Legislation  
  Statistics  
  Disqualification Register  
  Media Releases  
  Speeches  
  Submissions  
  APRA Insight  
  Non-Regulated Entities  
  Links  
  Contact APRA  
  Brian Gray Scholarship Program  
  Providing information and feedback to APRA  
  Whistleblowers  
  Graduate Program  
     

[2008]  [2007]  [2006]  [2005]  [2004]  [2003]  [2002]  [2001]  [2000]  [1999]  [1998] 

Media Releases


APRA: Good corporate governance about managing conflicts of interest

Tuesday, 26 November 2002
No. 02.53
For Immediate Release

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) today said that the regulated financial sector faces substantial challenges in achieving good standards of corporate governance and ethically managing conflicts of interest is critical to the process.

Speaking at the Sustainable Governance Conference 2002 in Melbourne, APRAs Executive General Manager, Mr Charles Littrell, said life insurance and superannuation entities were in an unusual position in that trustees and board members have a statutory duty to look first to the interest of policy holders and members.

"Normally, a boards first duty is to shareholders," he said. "The super fund member assumes both the traditional customer role and something akin to a shareholder role, but trustees have other competing interests to manage, notably employer sponsor expectations, and in for profit funds, the corporate manager expectations."

Focussing on life insurance and superannuation, Mr Littrell said that ethical risk in these industries starts with a fundamental conflict in distribution: the use of financial advisers who are largely commission-based.

"Their remuneration ultimately comes from the investor, but is filtered through one or more product providers. This filter raises the question: who is the adviser working for?"

Mr Littrell said APRA had concerns about the effect financial advice from commission-driven advisers had on a regulated entity.

"There is potential for advisers to vet inadequately the risks of the investments they are selling. If enough investors buy enough risky product from the same super fund, life company or other regulated entity, then in short order that entitys balance sheet will be concentrated in overly risky business and APRA may be forced to intervene."

Also noting that cost inefficiency could erode the retirement lifestyle of accumulation fund members and the corporate sponsors contributions into defined benefit funds, Mr Littrell said that while APRAs research on the position was far from definitive, there appeared to be no positive relationship between returns and expenses among the larger super funds.

"We are currently looking more closely at such issues via our research department," he said.


APRA is the prudential regulator of the financial services industry including banks, credit unions, building societies, general insurance and reinsurance companies, life insurance, friendly societies, and most members of the superannuation industry. It currently regulates $1.5 trillion in assets for 20 million Australians.


For further information: Media Enquiries only:
APRA Call Centre

Susan Morey

1300 131 060 APRA - Public Affairs
02 9210 3384

0438 124 524



 



Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions | General Insurance | Superannuation | Life Insurance | Friendly Societies

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority